An Instance of the Fingerpost: Explore the murky world of 17th-century Oxford in this iconic historical thriller
About this deal
Oxford is the intellectual seat of the country, a place of great scientific, religious, and political ferment. It is Set largely in the 1660s in Oxford, England, the intellectual seat of the country, a place of great scientific, religious, and political ferment. Such instances afford very great light and are of high authority, the course of interpretation sometimes ending in them and being completed. I enjoyed Fingerpost far more than my first Iain Pears novel, A Dream of Scipio (which also bills itself as a murder mystery on its back cover, but is most definitely not).
The novel tells us the same story four times from four utterly contradictory perspectives, so the reader only gradually realises in the closing pages what has been going on right under our very noses. I’m not joking here, by the way, and it’s very important to the story that these men are deeply religious. With rights sold for record-breaking sums around the world, An Instance of the Fingerpost is destined to become a major international publishing event. How were we supposed to care about this young poltroon’s fortunes when he’s already told us that he reached a fat and sassy late middle age because God grinned down upon him from the highest heaven and gave him the Celestial Wink?
He moved on to Oxford in an effort to improve his situation and fell in with some of the notable scientific minds of the day.
Our first narrator is Marco da Cola, a rather flamboyantly dressed young man from Venice who is in London on business for his father.He turns his hand to being a physician, untrained, but it seems that in this time period men with a degree in most anything would occasionally turn their hand to doctoring. things would spoil a little, and also the arrogance of George Villiers Duke of Buckingham nothing to do with the image left us of him in "The Three Musketeers" https://www. Set in Oxford in the 1660s - a time and place of great intellectual, religious, scientific and political ferment - this remarkable novel centres around a young woman, Sarah Blundy, who stands accused of the murder of Robert Grove, a fellow of New College. The writing is excellent, the storyline very compelling and Pears switches effortlessly between the cast of intriguing characters, real and fictional - I particularly enjoyed Marco de Cola's perspective on England and English ways - and the mystery unravels new twists and contradictions with every page. I've read several of this author's other works now and they're all good, but this is simply that much better.
He witnesses several trials including one which swirls around the central mystery - all the jurors are property owners (no women of course). Alas, the whole plot of this very long novel (almost as long as the 17th century itself) is can this unpleasant young man get his inheritance back and who murdered this unpleasant middle aged guy in Oxford who was mixed up in it somewhere and this young woman is accused of the crime but she prolly didn’t do it and she’s a witch no she’s not yes she is she looked at me funny once.Pears uses this as the intellectual framework for his novel, and has adopted three of Bacon’s tenets as epigraphs for his narrators’ stories: The Idols of the Market (which refers to a misuse of language); The Idols of the Cavern (which refers to personal obsessions); and The Idols of the Theater (which refers to the danger of false reasoning). Roter Pappband mit silbergeprägten Rückentiteln, Schutzumschlag, Lesebändchen und farbigen Vorsätzen.
The novel is narrated by four different narrators, each of which tells his version of the story: Marco da Cola, a Venetian Catholic physician who has just arrived in England; Jack Prescott, son of a Royalist traitor who is bound on clearing his father's name; John Wallis, a genius mathematician and cryptographer who served both Cromwell and Charles II, who has a fondness for conspiracies; and lastly Anthony Wood, an Oxford antiquarian. What relation do the part titles (“A Question of Precedence,” “The Great Trust,” “The Character of Compliance”) have to their respective narratives? A review of a novel that barely mentions its central plot, or many of its important features or themes, is perhaps a little unorthodox — but this is precisely in keeping with the novel itself. Most often, books are written so that the narrator's prose is meant to be taken as a reliable truth; this is definitely not the case here. Taking one part, which - seemingly - is at the heart of the story, but going ahead and showing the complexity of human nature, which ultimately always ends in one question: What drives us?Iain Pears (* 1955 in Coventry, West Midlands) ist ein englischer Kunsthistoriker und Schriftsteller. Remember that not everyone shares da Cola’s reaction; indeed, Richard Lower reacts to the play very differently. as you can appreciate each on its own, or maybe two alone would have been a success, but all at once were too much.